It turns out that when you call SLEEP_UNTIL_MESSAGE, the AT resumes from that very same line on the next execution. The original code incorrectly assumed that it would execute from the restart position (SET_PCS).
So sleeping can be thought of as pausing one execution half way through, rather than ending it.
This caused a bug, because once the AT receives a transaction it wakes up and resumes from the SLEEP_UNTIL_MESSAGE line, which is after the refund check. Even when it loops back around again it lands on labelRedeemTxnLoop = codeByteBuffer.position(); which is again after the refund check.
For now, the simplest fix is to only sleep when listed. We could have alternatively moved the SLEEP_UNTIL_MESSAGE above GET_BLOCK_TIMESTAMP, but this would still require users to send a random transaction to the AT to trigger the refund. Given that the ATs are only "alive" for 30 minutes once the trade begins, it's simpler to just execute every block and therefore allow the refunds to happen automatically.
Also modified the directory structure of single file resources to make them consistent with multi file resources.
For multi file resources, the original folder is renamed to "data", resulting in a layout such as:
data/file1.txt
data/file2.txt
data/dir1/file3.txt
For single file resources, the file is now moved into a "data" folder, like so:
data/file.txt
This is slightly unconventional, but is appropriate within the context of QDN to keep everything consistent.
This adds support for "unconfirmable" data uploads, which will be useful for Q-Chat. It also handles cases where a transaction is orphaned and then subsequently becomes invalid.
A website must contain one of the following files in its root directory to be considered valid:
index.html
index.htm
default.html
default.htm
home.html
home.htm
This is the first page that is loaded when loading a Qortal-hosted website.
This would happen if a name fills their limit, and then additional names are followed. Alternatively it could happen if the total storage capacity reduces due to disk space being used by other apps. Chunks are deleted at random to reduce the chance of the same chunk being deleted everywhere. Data loss is possible here for transactions that don't have many peers. We'll have to see in practice how much of a problem this is, but it's better than the scenario where one content creator consumes all space on their followers' nodes, leaving no space for other names that are subsequently followed.
This is calculated by the total capacity divided by the number of names the node follows. The idea here is that a single content creator can't upload terabytes of data and consume all the space on their followers' nodes. They can only use a proportion, with equal space given to each followed name. And since the limit is dynamic, following more names reduces the allocation to existing names.
This discourages an incorrect file size being included with a transaction, as the system will reject it and won't even serve it to other peers.
FUTURE: we could introduce some kind of blacklist to track invalid files like this, and avoid repeated attempts to retrieve them. It is okay for now as the system will backoff after a few attempts.
This API call could get quite heavy when large amounts of files are hosted, but it's preferable to maintaining a list in the database. Ideally we need to keep the database generic so that it can be bootstrapped without interfering with the state. We can always add caching and rate limiting if needed.
Chunk hashes are now stored off chain in a metadata file. The metadata file's hash is then included in the transaction.
The main benefits of this approach are:
1. We no longer need to limit the total file size, because adding more chunks doesn't increase the transaction size.
2. This increases the chain capacity by a huge amount - a 512MB file would have previously increased the transaction size by 16kB, whereas it now requires only an additional 32 bytes.
3. We no longer need to use variable difficulty; every transaction is the same size and so the difficulty can be constant no matter how large the files are.
4. Additional metadata (such as title, description, and tags) can ultimately be stored in the metadata file, as apposed to using a separate transaction & resource.
5. There is also scope for adding hashes of individual files into the metadata file, if we ever wanted to allow single files to be requested without having to download and build the entire resource. Although this is unlikely to be available in the short term.
The only real negative is that we now how to fetch the metadata file before we know anything about the chunks for a transaction. This seems to be quite a small trade off by comparison.
Since we're not live yet, there is no backwards support for on-chain hashes, so a new data testchain will be required. This hasn't been tested outside of unit tests yet, so there will likely be several fixes needed before it is stable.
It's not good to be moving files around in a method that should really be read only. This also adds an intentional checkAndRelocateMiscFiles() call rather than relying on a call to isDataLocal() which may be removed at any time.
This would have been caught by the max differences check anyway, but it's a good check to have in place in case we recalibrate or remove the differences check in the future.
