diff --git a/designdocs/Contexts.md b/designdocs/Contexts.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2f81a7ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/designdocs/Contexts.md
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# Design of API contexts
+
+This design doc describes the Context class that is new in 0.13.
+
+## Goals
+
+- To centralise various bits of configuration that are presently duplicated throughout the API, such as directories for
+  storing files, the depth at which a tx is considered un-reorgable, the chosen network parameters and so on.
+- To simplify bitcoinj programming in future.
+- To avoid the temptation to overload NetworkParameters with tweakable bits and pieces of misc configuration.
+- Unblock various bits of API evolution that are currently made difficult by the desire to avoid too many source code
+  changes by developers.
+
+## Background
+
+Since the very first version bitcoinj has had the concept of "network parameters": a class that wrapped various
+constants and magic numbers that distinguish the Bitcoin main network from the test network, and later, from settings
+meant only for unit tests and local regression testing.
+
+However unlike many APIs, we have never had a more general notion of context and as the library has grown we have
+ended up with an often confusing mishmash of duplicate settings and odd dependencies between objects. For example
+several parts of the library want to throw away data once a transaction is confirmed enough that we don't expect it
+to ever be re-orgd out of the chain, but there's no agreement on how deep that should be. The Wallet stores files, as
+does the block store, as does Orchid (Tor support), but each component must be told where to put this data individually.
+The problem gets worse on Android, where there are no JAR files and data must be shipped as external files. On this
+platform components that want to load data files must be configured with a path to their files individually and
+there's no central list of what components need this.
+
+Another problem is that in a few places, we have APIs that are in wide usage but need to start accepting an explicit
+component to allow the underlying code to evolve. Top of the list is TransactionConfidence. Consider
+TransactionConfidence.getDepthInBlocks(). This method takes no parameters and thus practically requires that the
+confidence object for every transaction in a wallet be touched on every single block in order to update its internal
+counter. A better approach would be for it to just record the height it appeared at and then take an AbstractBlockChain
+as a parameter (and/or explicit height) then do the subtraction. But often this method is called in places far away
+from the last reference to a block chain and so this will be a painful API change. Ideally we could spread it out over
+a release or two, to give developers time to update their code.
+
+An even bigger issue is Transaction.getConfidence() itself. We would like to rewrite the Wallet so it no longer stores
+Transaction objects at all. But this would be a major API break, because apps often want to know about the confidence
+of a transaction and currently the only way to obtain this is via the getConfidence() method. The TxConfidenceTable class
+(renamed from MemoryPool) acts as a global map of txhash to confidence object, but we can't adjust the prototype of
+Transaction.getConfidence() to take one without breaking lots of code.
+
+This proliferation of global variables makes it harder for developers to use multiple instances of bitcoinj
+simultaneously, for example, to do cross-chain trading of different cryptocurrencies against each other.
+
+Finally, several bitcoinj objects currently need to be plugged together in ways that aren't always obvious for full
+functionality to work. The constructors try to guide the developer but it's still a common source of mistakes.
+
+We can resolve these problems by introducing a notion of a global Context object, used in the same places and ways as
+NetworkParameters is today.
+
+## Context object
+
+The Context class is very simple. It is an immutable class that simply holds configuration data and references to other
+objects. For now, we do not allow on-the-fly reconfiguration of the data stored within it. This is to simplify the
+implementation code.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+Some code bases, when faced with similar problems to the above, use a dependency injection container. These pieces
+of software effectively replace the "new" keyword and handle all object creation themselves, then wire objects together
+based on annotations and centralised, explicit configuration.
+
+Dependency injection would seem to be an attractive solution, but:
+
+* Experience of using Guice inside Google leads me to believe it will result in confusing code that breaks IDE navigation
+  features and is hostile to the inexperienced code reader.
+* Guice effectively changes the Java language and that makes it harder for people to contribute. There may be DI
+  frameworks that are less aggressive, but I don't know of any.
+* DI often relies heavily on reflection and even runtime code synthesis, which we wish to avoid for performance reasons
+  and to avoid complicating ProGuard configuration and transpilation.
+* DI is effectively just a complicated and indirect means of having a global context object: doing it directly makes the
+  code clearer and avoids the need for developers to learn new things.
+
+## Transition plan
+
+NetworkParameters appears everywhere in the bitcoinj API, and so introducing Context will have a major impact on it
+as well. We aim to keep API churn under control, to avoid losing developers across difficult upgrades. As such,
+Context will be phased in gradually over one or two releases.
+
+We will follow these stages:
+
+1. Context starts out by wrapping NetworkParameters, TxConfidenceTable and the "event horizon" (the number of blocks
+   after which we assume re-orgs cannot happen).
+2. The construction of a Context object puts a reference to itself into a thread local storage slot. A static method
+   is provided which retrieves this, as well as another that either retrieves _or creates_ a new Context. This second
+   method is placed in the constructors of key classes like the Wallet or the block chain, and provides backwards
+   compatibility for developers. A log message is printed advising developers to update their code to create a Context
+   themselves. Attempting to use two instances of the library with different objects or NetworkParameters from the same
+   thread may have complications or not work properly during this stage.
+3. Classes that currently take NetworkParameters are augmented with new constructors that take Contexts instead. The
+   old c'tors simply check the NetworkParameters they are given matches the Context's own view and then call into the
+   new c'tors. An exception is thrown if they don't match.
+4. Release notes describe how to set a context and propagate it between threads. Developers can start migration in the
+   0.13 release.
+5. Internally, we start passing contexts through to objects that want one explicitly rather than relying on the thread
+   local storage slot.
+6. We mark constructors that take NetworkParameters as deprecated with the javadocs changing to point devs to the
+   Context-taking equivalents.
+7. In some future release, the deprecated methods are eventually removed, along with the Context thread local storage
+   slot and automated cross-thread propagation magic.
+
+In parallel, global configuration will keep being moved into the Context class to make it more useful.
\ No newline at end of file